https://ift.tt/2IJW4xO
This will be an interesting case to follow as it winds its way through the legal process.
Ralph Watson, the former chief creative officer for Crispin Porter + Bogusky’s Boulder, CO office has filed suit against the agency, and its parent MDC Partners for $20 million-plus for wrongful termination, defamation and related charges in Colorado’s U.S. District Court.
The suit comes after Watson was anonymously outed in January on the Diet Madison Avenue social media site for undisclosed sexual harassment against multiple women over the course of his career. The details are, well, there no details. At least not public ones. Yet.
No specifics whatsoever. According to Watson’s suit, CP+B told him that there weren’t any “credible” complaints about his behavior up to the point of the DMA posting. According to Watson, that’s because there was no misconduct on his part at all during his CP+B posting or at jobs before that.
No women came forward publicly, as they have in a number of other cases (Harvey Weinstein, Charlie Rose among them) to state specifically what transgressions were allegedly committed by Watson.
That’s a problem. Obviously charges like this can ruin a career. They may well have ruined Watson’s, we’ll see. And they should if the charges are true.
But anonymity isn’t acceptable when serious charges like these are being leveled against someone. What if the only “transgression” that occurred was that someone was passed over for promotion?
Or maybe Watson provided someone honest feedback, like, “this work totally sucks and here’s why.” Let’s face it, there a lot of fragile egos in the ad world, and it’s not inconceivable that someone would try to “get even” for some brutally honest criticism.
That said, while Watson denies all wrongdoing, MDC and CPB say they stand by the decision to fire Watson for cause. Hopefully they’ll be forced to show their hand during the court proceedings.
For now the lawsuit remains a classic “he said she said” confrontation. With any luck, the legal process will force the details into the public sphere. If it turns out that the agency scapegoated Watson without proof of wrongdoing to get out from under the glare of the DMA “cover-up” charges as Watson maintains, then maybe he should be paid the millions he’s asking for.
On the other hand if revelations do turn up supporting allegations of sexual misconduct and related behavior on Watson’s part then he deserves what it seems he already has: a career and reputation in tatters.
But if that’s the case, it’s important to see the details. That’s where the devil is, right?
Social media
via MediaPost.com https://ift.tt/2nAOR8B
July 2, 2018 at 08:54PM
No comments:
Post a Comment